Crypto and the Challenge of Regulation
I study the regulation of cryptocurrency and the urgent need for a coherent policy framework. Emerging technologies like cryptocurrency often defy traditional regulatory categories, and attempts to regulate them with without outdated laws frequently exceed statutory authority. With a multitude of competing stakeholders—entrepreneurs, financial incumbents, law enforcement, and consumers eager to use the technology—the US Congress has struggled to update the laws in a meaningful way.
George Stigler, the Nobel Prize–winning economist and leading figure in the Chicago School of Economics known for describing “regulatory capture”, observed in his 1963 “Public Regulation of the Securities Market” and later in the seminal “The Theory of Economic Regulation” that regulatory agencies often serve the interests of the industries they oversee rather than the public. Stigler critiqued the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), noting that its rules and enforcement frequently favored established players instead of protecting investors.
A striking example of regulatory capture in the crypto space was the SEC’s lawsuit against Ripple Labs Inc. over XRP, one of the largest and most widely used cryptocurrencies. In December 2020, the SEC filed a complaint alleging that Ripple had conducted an unregistered securities offering, claiming that XRP should have been registered under federal securities laws. XRP is a digital asset used for fast, low-cost cross-border payments and liquidity provision.
The lawsuit created enormous uncertainty for Ripple and the broader crypto market. Legal costs and regulatory pressure posed serious challenges to the company. After nearly three years of litigation, in July 2023, Ripple reached a settlement with the SEC that allowed it to continue operating XRP, with certain compliance measures. The case also saw intervention from XRP users—the so-called “XRP Army”—who filed a class action to assert their interest in accessing the technology, highlighting widespread public demand for blockchain innovation even amid regulatory scrutiny.
I own no cryptocurrency, but I study the industry as a textbook example of the perils of policy—both overreach and absence—and the consequences this has for innovation and consumer access.
- The GENIUS Act Paves the Way for U.S. Crypto Innovation. National Law Review, July 29, 2025
- A Pivotal Case Shaping Cryptocurrency Regulation. Regulatory Review. June 17, 2025
- Court Brings Gavel Down on SEC’s War on Crypto. DC Journal, August 20, 2024
- The SEC Came to Destroy Crypto, Not to Regulate It. DC Journal. April 3, 2024
- Stop Ignoring the SEC’s Malfeasance on Crypto. RealClear Policy. August 14, 2023
- The SEC Fought the Law and the Law Won. DC Journal. July 27, 2023
- The Hinman Documents Reveal a Deceitful SEC. DC Journal. June 13, 2023
- SEC Spin Doctors Trying To Hide Crypto Regulation Disaster. Forbes. January 8, 2023
- The FTX Fallout Exposes Risky Rigamarole Of Registration. Forbes. December 1, 2022
- Crypto Law Experts Suggest SEC Likely To Lose Key Case And Discredit Howey Test. Forbes. October 30, 2022
- Gensler Says Crypto Treated Just Like The Market; 200 SEC Lawsuits Say Otherwise. Forbes. August 28, 2022
- The SEC’s Crypto Bait And Switch And Investors’ Loss Of $15 Billion. Forbes. June 12, 2022
- The Meaning Of “We” At The SEC. Forbes. January 30, 2022
- The Crypto Uprising The SEC Didn’t See Coming. Forbes. August 31, 2021
- Toward A Ripple Test At The SEC. Forbes. August 22, 2021
- SEC Assault On Ripple Provokes Wider Debate. Forbes. June 30, 2021
- We Need A Ripple Test To Stop The SEC’s Overreach On Cryptocurrency. Forbes. May 18, 2021
- In The Ripple Case, The SEC Is Now On Trial – And Knows It. Forbes. April 18, 2021
- SEC Stumbles In Ripple Case, Lost In A Maze Of Its Own Making. The Wealth Advisor. March 12, 2021
- SEC V. Ripple: The Cryptocurrency Trial Of The Century. Forbes. December 29, 2020